Dog
Years
She asked me pleasantly how old my dog is,
and I answered pleasantly that she’s eleven.
Then she asked me how much that is in dog years,
and I answered that it takes the Earth
the same amount of time to go around the sun
for every species
on the planet.
The whole notion of dog years
is pathetically fraudulent
and shows a deep ignorance
about dogs.
Dogs don’t follow the
same developmental curve
as humans.
They mature quickly,
remain physically active for a long time –
if their people let ’em –
and then
decline rapidly.
Their life expectancy,
furthermore,
varies enormously
with their breed and size,
with small dogs and mixed breeds
tending to live longer
than large
ones and pure-breds.
Some pop-offs
have asserted dogmatically
when I point this out
that a dog year is six human years,
sometimes seven,
and that’s
that.
If that were the case,
then every dog I’ve ever had
has been sexually mature at the equivalent
of about five or six years old,
and still sprinting at full speed
when they’ve been older than 70.
Charmism
Every civilised, intelligent,
decent person
knows that it’s totally uncool
– and in most places illegal –
to discriminate against people
based on ethnicity,
ancestry
(I refuse to use that horrid
word ‘race’),
sex,
disability,
religion,
health,
sexual orientation,
gender identity,
political opinion,
or cultural beliefs.
Nearly everybody, however,
discriminates against people
with deficient social skills
and unsettling or irritating
personal behaviour characteristics.
I call this Charmism, and it stinks.
Show your dedication
to a truly inclusive society
by every once in a while
inviting somebody with a shitty
personality
to your home for dinner.
Well, maybe that’d be pushing it.
Take ’em to the pub for a burger and a beer
– if
you can afford it, that is.
Truth
Some people seem to take great delight
in presenting themselves
as more profound thinkers than they really are
when someone is trying
to tell them some truth
by asking as portentously as they can,
‘What is
Truth?’
I think the best way to describe
what telling the truth is
is by saying what it isn’t.
If it involves:
lies
evasion
trickery
deception
dishonesty
face-saving
arse-covering
perjury
unfairness
pretence
posturing
insincerity
spin
disingenuousness
fraudulence
dissimulation
subreption
or
prevarication,
or any combination of these
… it just
ain’t the truth.
PS: The emperor, by the
way, is buck naked.
Oxymoron or
Not?
It’s รกn astounding phenomenon,
yet I observe it all the time.
An apparent contradiction
at least in terms, but there it is.
I’ve seen them when I’m walking
my dog across the road,
and often when I’m driving
my car on city streets,
also in the checkout line
at the Pak n Save.
One ranted on the footpath
before the veggie stand.
I encountered one when trying
to buy a roasting pan.
One egregious specimen
was at a parent-teacher night.
My mother, oh, have mercy,
was one all her life.
It seems absurd,
but there they are –
destroying gender stereotypes –
with determination every day:
dick-headed women,
what the hell just makes them
turn out to be that way?
Fashionably
It’s something about which
I’ve had solid cognitive
knowledge
for at least a half a century,
but on a visceral level
I’ve never been able
to become accustomed
to eight o’clock
really meaning eight
forty-five.
The rationale for this
is completely beyond
my ability to understand.
The Atrocity Menu
We live in a time of
atrocities.
Maybe every time has been
a time of atrocities,
but the availability of
almost-instant information
about whatever atrocity or
atrocities du jour
any particular individual or
group
finds particularly appalling
makes them seem to be never-ending.
So many of them erupt, or drag
on,
across the global computer screens
that people world-wide
can pick and choose
from the current menu of
outrages
which one or ones they deem to
be
most deserving of their disgust
due to their perceptions
of the victims’ similarity to
themselves
or some other capricious
criteria
before being distracted
by tomorrow’s reports
of some other explosions of inhumanity.
Litterbug Picnics
They come to city parks,
whether by the river or by the lake or elsewhere,
and enjoy the serenity
of sitting or reclining
on well-tended lawns
under leafy trees
as they consume their junk food,
leaving their McDonald’s packaging,
KFC buckets,
fish-and-chips newspapers,
chippie bags, chocolate wrappers,
empty fizzy-drink bottles,
energy-drink cans, and RTD containers
lying on lawns that suddenly need more tending
for anybody else
to enjoy serenity on them.
One late afternoon in early 2012,
when I was doing a one-off job at Hamilton Gardens ,
I saw two young couples in hip-hop drag
walk in carrying plastic supermarket bags
filled with bags of chippies
and bottles of fizzy drinks
in vivid colours unknown to nature.
I couldn’t bring myself to smile at them
or even to think,
“Now, isn’t that nice.”
Whores
I dislike it when I hear people
use the word ‘whore’
in a disparaging, derogatory,
or belittling way
in regard to sex workers,
whether female, male, or
otherwise –
in reference to scientists
employed by Monsanto
and right-wing academic
economists, yes,
but I have great respect for sex workers.
I respect their courage,
their senses of humour and
irony,
and their honesty about money.
They harm no one,
and provide a needed service,
selling self-esteem
and the soothing warmth
of intimate physical contact
to socially inadequate,
fearful,
emotionally confused,
psychologically crippled,
clueless,
and otherwise lonely
members of the public –
not to mention obnoxious
assholes
whom nobody else, not even
their wives,
would touch with a barge pole,
and rightly so.
Perhaps most of all, then,
I respect sex workers for their strong
stomachs.
At least they don’t sell their
souls
or future generations
down the river.
Rank
Favourites
The bloke who took my money
at Kiwi Liquor in the Fairfield
shops
asked me what my favourite whisky is,
as I always buy the cheapest,
whichever that
is at the time.
I told him that it was impossible
for me to have a favourite,
as each has its own flavour and its own charm.
They’re just different to me –
neither better nor worse,
although I do tend to prefer blends to single malts.
He apparently found this hard to swallow,
as it were,
as every time I’ve gone in there since
he’s
interrogated me on the point.
So many people’s apparent need to rank things –
to have a favourite
food, piece of music, city, friend,
brand of anything,
celebrity of the opposite sex –
to decide which ones are better and which are worse,
and their seeming inability, and even refusal,
to acknowledge that they’re just different,
seems an odd and ugly and foreign
way to think about life,
to me, at least.
Pseudo-Inspirational
Crap
The word that comes immediately to mind is smug,
although the term arrogant ignorance would also fit.
Although now that I’m more reclusive than ever,
I don’t have to listen to it as much as before,
I run into it too damn often on facebook –
these little homilies superimposed
over inspirational artwork
saying that we can do whatever we want to do
and that we are whoever we choose to be
and that every aspect of our personalities
is the result of our own choices
and that if we don’t like it we can choose to change it
and all that sort of rubbish.
It’s the “I’m all right, Jack, and if you’re not it’s all your
fault” crap
that probably seems correct to people
who’ve never been severely traumatised,
either by violence or torture as adults
or daily by
family-member abuse as children.
Win That Prize
She asserted confidently
that artistic competitions
like TV’s The X Factor
are necessary for innovation,
and that without competition
creativity would stagnate.
I wonder in what
winner-take-all contest
Van Gogh was competing
when he painted Starry Night,
or Jane Austen
when she wrote Pride and Prejudice,
or Miles Davis
when he recorded Bitches Brew?





