Wednesday, 23 November 2016

Still Ranting

                      Dog Years

She asked me pleasantly how old my dog is,
and I answered pleasantly that she’s eleven.
Then she asked me how much that is in dog years,
and I answered that it takes the Earth
the same amount of time to go around the sun
for every species on the planet.

The whole notion of dog years
is pathetically fraudulent
and shows a deep ignorance
about dogs.

Dogs don’t follow the
same developmental curve
as humans.
They mature quickly,
remain physically active for a long time –
if their people let ’em –
and then decline rapidly.

Their life expectancy,
furthermore,
varies enormously
with their breed and size,
with small dogs and mixed breeds
tending to live longer
than large ones and pure-breds.

Some pop-offs
have asserted dogmatically
when I point this out
that a dog year is six human years,
sometimes seven,
and that’s that.

If that were the case,
then every dog I’ve ever had
has been sexually mature at the equivalent
of about five or six years old,
and still sprinting at full speed
when they’ve been older than 70.


                       Charmism

Every civilised, intelligent, decent person
knows that it’s totally uncool
– and in most places illegal –
to discriminate against people
based on ethnicity,
ancestry
(I refuse to use that horrid word ‘race’),
sex,
disability,
religion,
health,
sexual orientation,
gender identity,
political opinion,
or cultural beliefs.

Nearly everybody, however,
discriminates against people
with deficient social skills
and unsettling or irritating
personal behaviour characteristics.
I call this Charmism, and it stinks.

Show your dedication
to a truly inclusive society
by every once in a while
inviting somebody with a shitty personality
to your home for dinner.

Well, maybe that’d be pushing it.
Take ’em to the pub for a burger and a beer
if you can afford it, that is.


                                Truth
Some people seem to take great delight
in presenting themselves
as more profound thinkers than they really are
when someone is trying
to tell them some truth
by asking as portentously as they can,
‘What is Truth?’

I think the best way to describe
what telling the truth is
is by saying what it isn’t.
If it involves:
lies
evasion
trickery
deception
dishonesty
face-saving
arse-covering
perjury
unfairness
pretence
posturing
insincerity
spin
disingenuousness
fraudulence
dissimulation
subreption
or
prevarication,
or any combination of these
… it just ain’t the truth.

     PS: The emperor, by the way, is buck naked.


                Oxymoron or Not?
It’s รกn astounding phenomenon,
yet I observe it all the time.
An apparent contradiction
at least in terms, but there it is.
I’ve seen them when I’m walking
my dog across the road,
and often when I’m driving
my car on city streets,
also in the checkout line
at the Pak n Save.
One ranted on the footpath
before the veggie stand.
I encountered one when trying
to buy a roasting pan.
One egregious specimen
was at a parent-teacher night.
My mother, oh, have mercy,
was one all her life.
It seems absurd,
but there they are –
destroying gender stereotypes –
with determination every day:
dick-headed women,
what the hell just makes them
turn out to be that way?


        Fashionably
It’s something about which
I’ve had solid cognitive knowledge
for at least a half a century,
but on a visceral level
I’ve never been able
to become accustomed
to eight o’clock
really meaning eight forty-five.
The rationale for this
is completely beyond
my ability to understand.



                 The Atrocity Menu
We live in a time of atrocities.
Maybe every time has been
a time of atrocities,
but the availability of almost-instant information
about whatever atrocity or atrocities du jour
any particular individual or group
finds particularly appalling
makes them seem to be never-ending.

So many of them erupt, or drag on,
across the global computer screens
that people world-wide
can pick and choose
from the current menu of outrages
which one or ones they deem to be
most deserving of their disgust
due to their perceptions
of the victims’ similarity to themselves
or some other capricious criteria
before being distracted
by tomorrow’s reports
of some other explosions of inhumanity.


                     Litterbug Picnics
They come to city parks,
whether by the river or by the lake or elsewhere,
and enjoy the serenity
of sitting or reclining
on well-tended lawns
under leafy trees
as they consume their junk food,
leaving their McDonald’s packaging,
KFC buckets,
fish-and-chips newspapers,
chippie bags, chocolate wrappers,
empty fizzy-drink bottles,
energy-drink cans, and RTD containers
lying on lawns that suddenly need more tending
for anybody else to enjoy serenity on them.

One late afternoon in early 2012,
when I was doing a one-off job at Hamilton Gardens,
I saw two young couples in hip-hop drag
walk in carrying plastic supermarket bags
filled with bags of chippies
and bottles of fizzy drinks
in vivid colours unknown to nature.
I couldn’t bring myself to smile at them
or even to think,
“Now, isn’t that nice.”



                               Whores
I dislike it when I hear people use the word ‘whore’
in a disparaging, derogatory, or belittling way
in regard to sex workers,
whether female, male, or otherwise –
in reference to scientists employed by Monsanto
and right-wing academic economists, yes,
but I have great respect for sex workers.

I respect their courage,
their senses of humour and irony,
and their honesty about money.
They harm no one,
and provide a needed service,
selling self-esteem
and the soothing warmth
of intimate physical contact
to socially inadequate,
fearful,
emotionally confused,
psychologically crippled,
clueless,
and otherwise lonely
members of the public –
not to mention obnoxious assholes
whom nobody else, not even their wives,
would touch with a barge pole,
and rightly so.

Perhaps most of all, then,
I respect sex workers for their strong stomachs.

At least they don’t sell their souls
or future generations
down the river.


               Rank Favourites
The bloke who took my money
at Kiwi Liquor in the Fairfield shops
asked me what my favourite whisky is,
as I always buy the cheapest,
whichever that is at the time.

I told him that it was impossible
for me to have a favourite,
as each has its own flavour and its own charm.
They’re just different to me –
neither better nor worse,
although I do tend to prefer blends to single malts.
He apparently found this hard to swallow,
as it were,
as every time I’ve gone in there since
he’s interrogated me on the point.

So many people’s apparent need to rank things –
to have a favourite
food, piece of music, city, friend,
brand of anything,
celebrity of the opposite sex –
to decide which ones are better and which are worse,
and their seeming inability, and even refusal,
to acknowledge that they’re just different,
seems an odd and ugly and foreign
way to think about life,
to me, at least.


                    Pseudo-Inspirational Crap
The word that comes immediately to mind is smug,
although the term arrogant ignorance would also fit.
Although now that I’m more reclusive than ever,
I don’t have to listen to it as much as before,
I run into it too damn often on facebook –
these little homilies superimposed
over inspirational artwork
saying that we can do whatever we want to do
and that we are whoever we choose to be
and that every aspect of our personalities
is the result of our own choices
and that if we don’t like it we can choose to change it
and all that sort of rubbish.
It’s the “I’m all right, Jack, and if you’re not it’s all your fault” crap
that probably seems correct to people
who’ve never been severely traumatised,
either by violence or torture as adults
or daily by family-member abuse as children.


      Win That Prize
She asserted confidently
that artistic competitions
like TV’s The X Factor
are necessary for innovation,
and that without competition
creativity would stagnate.

I wonder in what
winner-take-all contest
Van Gogh was competing
when he painted Starry Night,
or Jane Austen
when she wrote Pride and Prejudice,
or Miles Davis
when he recorded Bitches Brew?


Sunday, 20 November 2016

This Sporting Life

            CG 2010
Watching a road cycling race
on TV with the sound on mute
and Weather Report being funky on the box,
I wondered what goes on
in the minds of the cyclists
at the back of the peloton,
without a hope of moving up.
It was beyond me.



                        Basketball Coaches
Basketball coaches
have dreams about exes and ohs
running offensive moves and defensive traps.
Basketball coaches
are like choreographers,
in a competitive contact ballet.
Basketball coaches
have to take heaps of shit when their teams are losing.
Basketball coaches
know that the fundamentals have to be right
for the rest to fall into place –
attack the break; don’t sag off it,
play defence with your feet, not your hands,
block out, give and go, pick and roll,
feet at 60 degrees for foul shots,
defend the passing lanes off the ball,
follow your shots, cover the point,
and so on.
Basketball coaches
know that speed is important, but there’s no substitute for size.
Basketball coaches
know the difference between getting beaten and just losing –
a team gets beaten when the other team
has to do all it can to defeat it;
when a team loses it beats itself.
The most profound thing
that basketball coaches learn
after doing it for enough years
is that it’s better to be lucky than to be good.


             The Excitement of Sport
Watching the Asia Cup cricket final on TV,
I enormously enjoyed
the shots of the spectators,
especially the young Pakistani women,
with and without hijab scarves,
and the young Sri Lankan women –
all belonging to healthy elites who can afford travel
and who wear expensive clothing –
all of them excitedly shouting
and flashing straight, white, smiling teeth
and jumping up and down
in response to the exploits
of the healthy young male athletes
disporting themselves down on the greensward.

I could almost smell
the oestrogen and vaginal fluids
through the television.

Turned me on, it did.


                     Lucky Blokes
Watching amateur club rugby league on Maori TV,
it became evident that much of it is ritual,
as the players on every team
from every one of Auckland’s
ethnocultural backgrounds represented
behave with almost identical
celebrations or commiserations
whenever one of their teammates
either scores a try
or stuffs up.
I envy them
their standard-issue,
done-by-rote,
reflexively automatic
blokey mateship.


      The Gold-Medal Women’s Curling Match
Most of the winter Olympics
is tedious on TV,
but I found myself
with nothing else to do after work
than watch the gold-medal
women’s curling match.
In general I’d be inclined
to back Sweden over Canada,
other things being equal,
but that Canadian woman
who shoved the stone instead of sweeping in front of it
had stupefyingly magnetic, riveting eyes,
chestnut hair, and a charismatic smile
that really did it for me.
The teams’ tactics were beyond me,
but that didn’t matter.

Sweden won.
Oh, well …
that’s sport.
Stupefyingly magnetic, riveting eyes
don’t matter.



                      Aggro Ridiculoso
One crashed into the other awkwardly –
who knows why?
Clumsiness? Bad judgement? Recklessness?
Callous disregard? Malice? Fatigue?
Just one of those things that happen?
– anyway, the testosterone and adrenaline and
who-knows-what-other hormone levels
zoomed up to levels requiring action,
but they couldn’t afford to take action
with real consequences,
as they both wanted to stay in the game,
so they went into a peacock display of chest bumping
and aggressive, glaring-eyed forehead leaning,
the garishly bright and unnatural colours
and the silly patterns
of their football shorts and jerseys
making them look hilariously ridiculous.

A case could, of course, be made that, deep down,
we’re all ridiculous –
the suffering involved in most people’s lives, however,
puts something of a damper on real-life hilarity
in regard to those who don’t deserve ridicule,
although human pain
does make certain psychopaths giggle and snigger.


                      Netball
When we were reading stuff about New Zealand
in 1988 whilst preparing to shift here from Guam,
I read that the country’s major sports
are rugby, cricket, and netball.
Now I’d seen people playing rugby in the park,
and cricket scenes in movies,
but I’d never even heard of netball,
and wondered whether
it was what Kiwis called volleyball,
volleyball being a major sport on the island.

The first time I saw it on TV I couldn’t believe it.
It resembled a sport that girls played when I was a kid
called girls’ basketball – since discarded for being sexist,
but I couldn’t figure out why the defenders had to stand back
and let the attackers shoot unbothered.

Nearly a quarter of a century later,
after shepherding two daughters
through the Saturday netball circus –
it seems as if it was usually in the rain but it probably wasn’t –
I still think it’s weird as shit.
I’m not keen on watching sports
in which the officials blow their whistles
every few seconds
for infractions that I don’t see.



                    Ryne Duren
When I was a kid in the fifties
I became fascinated by
a baseball pitcher named Ryne Duren.
His genius at gamesmanship and showmanship
eclipsed his skill at pitching,
but that’s what makes memories.
Sure, he could throw a baseball faster
than just about anybody ever could,
at somewhere about 175 kph.
Think of that.
He was also almost legally blind
and wore glasses that were, as everyone said,
as thick as Coke bottles.
His problem, of course, was control.
A relief pitcher, he would come on in the middle of an inning
and while warming up was always sure
to fire some of his high-velocity offerings
several rows up into the grandstand
and some others somewhere near
where the next batter’s head would be likely to be.
At least once that I recall, perhaps imprecisely,
he took off his glasses to polish them,
dropped them on the ground,
and then got down on his hands and knees
to feel around blindly for them
until he found them, put them back on,
and blazed one more warm-up cannonball, high,
before nodding that he was ready.
Batter up!


                Russian Tennis Fans
Watching the St Petersburg Open tennis tournament,
with the sound off, of course,
it seemed as if the clearly affluent spectators
were almost entirely either
women who looked like trophies,
or maybe porn actresses,
or men who looked like thugs –
or like cruel, expensively dressed gangsters
who employed thugs.


              Pace and Reproduction
One thing that struck me
when I watched the Beijing Olympics
was how Usain Bolt stood out from the field
with his sense of humour and personality
as well as the pace at which he motored down the track.
I also noticed the looks on the faces
of the young Chinese women in the crowd
and on the stadium staff
whenever he appeared.
I wonder how many half-Jamaican babies
who may end up being able to run fast
were born in Beijing in 2009?


                  Wimbledon Celebrities
One of the best parts of watching tennis on TV,
of course,
especially a grand-slam tournament such as Wimbledon,
was the editor’s selection of shots
from cameras focusing on celebrities in the crowd.
It amused me that I was unable to recognise most of them.
I assumed that those who were of A Certain Age
but wearing well
were either former tennis greats or minor royalty.
The glittery young women with perfect teeth
who’d look comfortably at home
on the covers of fashion magazines
were likely the players’ wives and girlfriends,
and the fashionably clothed and barbered young men,
also with excellent teeth,
their husbands and boyfriends.
Particularly fascinating were the apparently professional celebrities
taking time out from shoots for the covers
of supermarket check-out aisle magazines
to glom some world-class, global exposure
before sinking into the ranks of the uncelebrated
by the time next year’s Wimbledon rolled around.
I had no idea who any of them were.